Who is Christ’s Avenging Army? Angels or Saints?
Why would Jesus teach us to lay down the sword and to turn the other cheek, only to have us rise up in the bloodiest battle of history?
At times a comment made during discussion with brethren will remain occupying my mind long after the discussion ends. One such case involves a segment from Psalm 149:
Let the faithful exult in glory; let them sing for joy on their couches. Let the high praises of God be in their throats and two-edged swords in their hands, to wreak vengeance on the nations and chastisement on the peoples, to bind their kings with chains and their nobles with fetters of iron, to execute on them the judgment written! This is glory for all his faithful ones. Praise the LORD! (Psalm 149:5-9 RSV).
The brethren concerned viewed the Psalmist’s words as proof that the saints will engage in hand-to-hand combat to assist Christ in the slaying of the wicked hordes of the Gogian host. The thought of wielding a sword and taking vengeance upon the enemies of Israel seemed to be an exciting prospect to some participating in the discussion.
Reflection upon this thought was and remains disturbing to me. Why would Jesus teach us to lay down the sword and to turn the other cheek, only to have us rise up in the bloodiest battle of history? Why would the Master teach “thou shalt not kill” to be the letter of the Law but “don’t even be angry with your brother” to be the true spirit of the Law, if we are to yet wreak vengeance on the nations?
There is no question that Almighty God is the judge of all the earth, and when His righteousness is rejected, His commands disobeyed and His worship ignored, He does require men’s lives as the penalty for their sin. Under his Divine rule, Israel was the arm of His judgment over the nations, and even David in obedience to God’s commands, did slay his tens of thousands.
In Christ, however, warfare is not the conduct that the LORD originally ordained. Jesus as king of the coming Kingdom of God is to bring a restoration of peaceful Eden to a war-weary world. As his subjects we have been trained to be faithful servants exhibiting the fruits of the spirit and not vengeful warriors.
Naturally, brethren have asked me, “If the LORD God asked you to take up the sword for his sake, would you refuse?” Of course not!” was my reply, but it would be something that I would dread rather than relish. What is the truth, brothers and sisters? What does Jesus expect of us at his return? Will we be asked to become killers? Or will he expect us to act as he has taught us: to continue in gentle and meek service to him?
What does Jesus expect of us at his return?
Does Psalm 149 really teach that in the Last Days, we will be joining a vast army to execute God’s wrath? I don’t think so. If we consider the passages from Psalm 138 onward, the words of David are being read. These verses are the refrain of that great King of Israel who was anointed by God to defeat the wicked nations round about him and to keep Israel obedient to the Almighty’s laws.
He was specifically charged by the command of God to execute judgment in the land and on the nations. There is nothing in this series of Psalms to suggest that Psalm 149 is at the time of the end. Rather, Psalm 149 is a call to arms for the men of Israel to follow David and support him in battle. It is not a call for the saints in the Last Days to take up arms for Christ.
Turning next to Revelation, we find a chapter often used by brethren to demonstrate the belief that the saints shall accompany Christ into battle:
This is a magnificent scene of the Lord Jesus Christ riding into battle on a white horse, followed by all the armies of heaven. Many brothers and sisters understand those arrayed in fine linen who slay the kings and captains of the wicked nations to be the saints. My question brethren remains, “Is this really what is going to happen?”
Much of the Book of Revelation is symbol and allegory. That being the case, do we see the following depictions as literal or symbolic?
Is Jesus’ robe actually dipped in blood?
Are His eyes really a flame of fire?
Is a sharp sword coming out of his mouth?
Are we to actually tread the winepress of blood?
Clearly the imagery represents the destruction of evil and the victory of the righteous, but hardly in a literal war. In fact, the most powerful weapon that Jesus uses is that sharp sword in his mouth.
Without doubt, the sword that Jesus uses is the “word of God.” The “word of God” reveals truth and exposes error. It judges rightly and exposes evil. But the question remains, “Who are the armies of heaven? Are they the saints (the bride of Christ in verses 7 and 8) who are clothed in fine linen? Or are they the angels of God—his heavenly host?”
Throughout Scripture, angels are frequently described as being clothed with fine linen. Consider these three examples:
To my mind, the “armies of heaven” conveys a very different message than a multitude of saints. God’s armies are, in fact, the heavenly host of angels that surround Him and are prepared to do His bidding, whether it be bringing judgment, delivering his commands, or warring against the nations. Jacob and Elisha were privileged to momentarily see this host:
When Israel was in the wilderness, the LORD and His armies of angels came from Sinai:
When God delivered the Law to the children of Israel from Sinai (which is what this verse is about) did He really bring “ten thousands of (immortalized) saints” with Him? Surely that is impossible, for all of the deceased saints were, at the time, still dead and buried. There had been no resurrection. The word “saints” must then mean something else and indeed, in most modern versions, “saints” is translated as “holy ones.” Thus, the ten thousands of “holy ones” were God’s angels; his heavenly host come to do his bidding.
“Heavenly host” or “LORD of hosts” (Hebrew: “armies”) refers to the army of angels mentioned both in the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, as well as other Jewish and Christian texts. The account of the birth of Jesus by Luke serves as an example:
The LORD of Hosts is a very common description of the Almighty because it assigns to Him the whole host of heaven as His army. The word for “hosts” has a military orientation. Strong makes the following entry regarding its meaning:
HOST—H6635 tsâbâ’ tsebâ’âh
From H6633; a mass of persons (or figurative things), especially regularly organized for war (an army); by implication a campaign, literally or figuratively (specifically hardship, worship): – appointed time, (+) army, (+) battle, company, host, service, soldiers, waiting upon, war [-fare].1
This same Hebrew word (tsâbâ) is used in 1 Kings to describe how the LORD God is surrounded by His angels:
As we learn from the New Testament, our Lord Jesus taught that, while the Creator has the charge of His army of angels, the newborn children of God in Christ are blessed with an entirely new mission. While we are still to combat evil and to defend the way of the LORD, our weapons are neither made of steel nor utilize arrows. He tells us, in fact, that we are to lay down the sword:
What then are the weapons of war that the saints will actually be using to overcome wickedness? They are none other than the armor of God which the Apostle Paul commended to the brethren of Ephesus:
This is our warfare. We take on the whole armor of God and with these spiritual weapons we defeat the enemy, which is sin in the flesh. Jesus was clad in this armor as well and used his sword; namely, the words of his mouth, to defeat sin and to punish evil.
When we turn our attention to Revelation 1 and 2, we will see how the imagery and many symbols are used to convey this message:
Jesus tells his ecclesias to repent. If they fail to do so, he will make war against those who bring in false teachings with the sword of his mouth; that is the word of God.
Jesus tells his ecclesias to repent.
I reference two more passages that I have heard used by some Bible students to imply the saints will join Christ in the latter-day warfare. The first was spoken to the brethren at Thessalonica:
“Increasing and abounding in love” and being “unblameable in holiness” does not sound like a call to arms. In the NIV, verse 13 is translated as “holy ones,” which in the Old Testament is frequently the term denoting the angels.
The second verse I have heard used to defend the saints’ participation in war is from Zechariah:
In regard to the term “saints,” Strong has the following notation:
saints—H6918 (holy ones ESV)
qâdôsh qâdôsh
From H6942; sacred (ceremonially or morally); (as noun) God (by eminence), an angel, a saint, a sanctuary: —holy (One), saint.2
Again, in the ESV and the NIV, the last line of verse 5 reads “holy ones,” not “saints.” Interestingly, in both Hebrew and Greek, the root words for “saints” simply means “holy,” and being an adjective, it is always translated to describe something. For example, holy things, Holy Spirit, holy people and holy angels.
I suggest therefore that in the two passages examined, the term “holy ones” refers to God’s holy angels who will accompany Jesus when he returns.
Now, let’s see what the rest of Scripture says about the coming of Jesus. The Scriptures do seem to bear out the belief that it is the angels who accompany Christ at his return. Repeatedly, we read of their involvement in the events of the advent:
The angels are tasked with executing God’s judgments upon the nations. We are to spend our lifetime in training for the Kingdom, not in preparing for war, but in loving our enemies and reaching out to all who do not see the light of the gospel. Our lives are to be examples of the mind of Christ Jesus as evidenced in us by the fruits of the Spirit:
May this mission constantly occupy our minds.
Al Hussey,
Niagara Ecclesia, ON
This article is an excerpt from a book Bro. Hussey has published, called “Bible Studies on the Book of Revelation and the Last Days.” It is currently available on Amazon as a paperback, and as a Kindle eBook.
- Strong, James. Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance. (New York, New York: The Methodist Book Concern, 1890)
- Ibid.